-->
CM Magazine Cover
From the Fall 2026 Issue

Mindset Matters: Proactivity vs. Reactivity and the Cost

Building Longevity: Smarter Maintenance for Lasting Value

Feature || Jessica Campbell

Preparedness. Prevention. Control. These are the words a group of our clients noted when asked what the word proactivity meant to them. Conversely, when asked about reactivity, they described stress, rush, panic, or “feeling at the mercy of [their] situation.” While budgets and timelines can, and should, influence decision-making, the approach taken and the mindset while engaging trade services make all the difference.

Proactive vs. Reactive Roofing

Professionals specializing in leak remediation, emergency services, localized repairs, and maintenance encounter leaks on a daily basis and see firsthand the distinct correlation between these attitudes and their respective outcomes. When clients have time for thoughtful planning and understand the needs of their roof system, we see fewer urgent problems. Boards can plan for necessary expenditures or break required work into manageable phases. If leaks do occur, they are easier to identify on an otherwise well-maintained roof.

Too often, however, we encounter boards that are deterred from completing roofing work due to budgetary constraints, governed by the belief that understanding the condition of the roof will simply uncover expenses. Instead, adopting a reactive approach, they wait until water is dripping into a livable space before treating it as the alarm bell to act. Roofs represent approximately 5 to 7% of a building’s capital cost, yet they protect 100% of the building and its contents. A word of roofing advice: a leak should not be the only signal to act.

Reactive approaches generally lead to higher expenditure because, in many cases, leaks occur for some time before reaching an area where it becomes visible to the occupant. Water often travels unnoticed through insulation, the concrete roof deck, and drywall before finally appearing inside a unit, creating water damage along the way.

On flat roof systems and inverted roof membrane assemblies, leaks may originate from a small defect somewhere across a 3,000-20,000-square-foot roof. Multiple areas of deterioration can further complicate diagnosis, creating numerous potential entry points and confounding variables that make locating the true source more time-consuming.

The same dollar can go much further when roofs are inspected regularly, and small deficiencies are addressed over time through regular maintenance rather than allowing issues to accumulate. Making small changes to become more proactive creates predictable expenses on a manageable cycle. Delaying roofing work often results in a growing list of deferred maintenance items that eventually overwhelms the board when the backlog reaches a breaking point.

Similar to avoiding the dentist when you have a minor toothache or ignoring a new squealing noise coming from your car engine, postponing the maintenance requirements of your roof typically makes matters worse. Maintenance is an accepted part of many aspects of our lives, whether it’s routine oil changes, regular dental checkups, or building strength through a consistent fitness routine. That same mindset needs to extend to roof management.

While your roof is not the most expensive item in your reserve fund, it protects nearly every other component within the corporation. Although a poorly maintained roof may continue functioning for some time, its eventual failure can be catastrophic. Avoiding maintenance to achieve short-term savings and relying on a roof system to “hold on a little longer” is a gamble no condo corporation should take with the building’s long-term structural integrity, the safety of its residents, or their collective investment.

The Cost of Deferred Maintenance

We witnessed this firsthand during recent Ontario winters, when ice damming became a pervasive issue. Ice damming is generally a heat-loss issue often exacerbated by clogged gutter systems, but clients with known attic deficiencies, clogged downspouts, and existing roofing concerns experienced failures during the height of the storm and required immediate solutions to problems that had developed over years or even decades. Once frozen, our options for addressing these issues became far more limited.

At that point, Mother Nature took the reins. The devastation extended far beyond broken shingles and detached gutters. We saw damaged property beneath fallen icicles, costly interior restoration, safety hazards, financial strain, and significant emotional stress for residents and property managers alike.

Without established maintenance budgets or long-term planning, many sites had little understanding of where to begin. Existing maintenance backlogs remained unchecked, new storm-related issues were added to an already overwhelming list, and there were insufficient funds available for repairs that insurance would not cover. This is the human cost of deferred maintenance. 

In the roofing industry, roof conditions, priorities, and budgets vary considerably. However, it is difficult to watch preventable issues snowball into devastating outcomes. When performing routine maintenance on a typical roof, we commonly identify clogged drains, accumulated debris, sealants requiring renewal, and minor rust. As the roof ages, we begin seeing more significant concerns: damaged vents, advanced corrosion, missing shingles, and granule loss as ultraviolet exposure gradually deteriorates the membrane. Short-term maintenance delays are reversible, but severe neglect leads to irreversible damage. Corrosion causes holes in rooftop units, membrane debonding leaves the roof waterlogged, and unaddressed condensation can trigger roof deck sagging or structural issues—ultimately forcing an expensive, full roof replacement.

While no one can predict exactly where or when a leak will occur, we can confidently say that failing to maintain roof components will shorten the service life of the roof and contribute to premature replacements. Many people reference the manufacturer’s projected roof lifespan when discussing roofing but overlook the routine maintenance required to achieve it. These projected lifespans are intended as guidelines and assume regular maintenance is performed throughout the roof’s service life.

The reality is that every roof will eventually require repairs. The question is not if, but when and under what circumstances. A proactive approach does not eliminate roofing expenses; it changes their nature. Instead of responding to emergencies under pressure, boards can make informed decisions, distribute costs, reduce disruption to residents, and better protect one of the corporation’s most important assets. The goal is not to spend more on your roof. It is to spend wisely, deliberately, and before small issues become costly emergencies. When it comes to roof management, mindset truly matters.


Jessica Campbell is an Account Manager and Marketing Coordinator at Detail Roofing & Sheet Metal. Joining Detail in 2017, she has extensive experience helping clients navigate roofing repairs, maintenance, and leak remediation across Southern Ontario and British Columbia. She holds a BA in Communication from Simon Fraser University. 
www.detailroof.ca
 


View PDF View Flipbook Back to Latest Issue


Search Archives

Issue Archive
Article Categories
iTunes
iTunes

CM Magazine
Subscribe